Comments on: Calculus Fun http://trevorcreech.com/blog/2008/07/27/calculus-fun/ Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:20:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Joseph http://trevorcreech.com/blog/2008/07/27/calculus-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-93708 Joseph Sun, 12 Oct 2008 07:21:25 +0000 http://trevorcreech.com/?p=562#comment-93708 Granted, this is an uglier integral, I believe that the understanding of how it evaluates can help with other areas substantially. Even in looking up integral forms in the tables will not always be evident, and they require knowledge of the techniques of integration in order to fit a desired integral to a specific solution. Granted, this is an uglier integral, I believe that the understanding of how it evaluates can help with other areas substantially.

Even in looking up integral forms in the tables will not always be evident, and they require knowledge of the techniques of integration in order to fit a desired integral to a specific solution.

]]> By: Stephen Lake http://trevorcreech.com/blog/2008/07/27/calculus-fun/comment-page-1/#comment-93009 Stephen Lake Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:59:32 +0000 http://trevorcreech.com/?p=562#comment-93009 I think the answer is actually 4. This tests our understanding of calculus how exactly? I think it is a better test of how performing numerous lines of simple math in your head, under pressure, without making a single mistake. This reminds me of PDeng. Why not test application, or something that truly tests understanding of the material? I think the answer is actually 4.

This tests our understanding of calculus how exactly? I think it is a better test of how performing numerous lines of simple math in your head, under pressure, without making a single mistake. This reminds me of PDeng. Why not test application, or something that truly tests understanding of the material?

]]>